| 
		The national budget in three minutes  By MUNGAI KIHANYA The Sunday Nation Nairobi, 04 July 2010   
		The Minister for Finance read his budget for 2010/11 
		and he is planning to spend close to one trillion shillings. Some media 
		reports said that this is the largest budget in history and I found that 
		comment curious. When you think about it, every budget is always larger 
		than the one of the previous year. Therefore, there is nothing special 
		about the current one being greater than all previous ones. Take it from 
		me; even the one for next year will be bigger than all the others in 
		history! 
		If you didn’t know, one trillion can mean different 
		things to different people. In the USA, it is the 
		number one followed by 12 zeroes. In the 
		UK, it has 18 zeroes, and in some parts of France, a trillion has 24 zeroes. To 
		understand the reasons behind this discrepancy, you will have to check 
		the archives: World of Figures, 
		1st August 2004. 
		Unfortunately, I did not get a chance to listen to 
		this year’s budget speech, but I managed to get a copy of the full text 
		from the Ministry of Finance website (www.treasury.go.ke). In a 
		nutshell; the government plans to spend Sh998.8 billion in the coming 
		financial year. This means the trillion we heard in the media about was 
		the US
		kind. 
		If you divide that sum equally amongst 40 million 
		Kenyans, it comes to about Sh25,000 per person over the next 12 months. 
		That is slightly over Sh2,000 per month. Now, depending on your world 
		view, you can either see this as the amount of money that will be spent 
		on you, or the money which you will need to contribute in order to keep 
		our national affairs running. I leave that up to you. 
		Out of the Sh998.8b, about Sh320b (32 per cent) will 
		go towards development projects and Sh675b (68 per cent) to recurrent 
		expenditure. While development expenses are somewhat self-explanatory 
		(roads, hospitals, schools etc), recurrent costs need elaboration. They 
		include administrative expenses (salaries, rents, consumables etc) and 
		loan repayments (including interest and other attendant costs). 
		Now those figures may not mean much unless they are 
		compared to some past record. The year 2002 provides a good point of 
		comparison because this was when KANU (Mr. Uhuru Kenyatta’s party) lost 
		the leadership of the country for the first time since independence. 
		In that year, the total budget was Sh324b. That’s 
		about one third of this year’s figure. Another way of looking at it is 
		that the budget has been growing at an average of 15 per cent every 
		year. A word caution is necessary here: this is not the rate of economic 
		growth! 
		Of the Sh324b, only Sh43b was earmarked for 
		development in 2002 and the rest was meant for recurrent expenses. In 
		the 2010 budget, the figure is Sh320b – seven and a half times higher. 
		In fact, the development expenditure this year will be almost equal to 
		the total budget of 2002. 
		Another improvement is the distribution between 
		development and recurrent expenses. It is 32-to-68 respectively this 
		year, compared to 13-to-87 in 2002. That means we are increasing 
		spending on development faster than that on consumption. |